MULTI-ATS SIMULATION
5 systems. One dashboard.
See how your resume performs across every major applicant tracking system — with per-system scores and issue detection.
Keyword matching focus
Experience relevance
Strict formatting requirements
Legacy parsing technology
Education/certification weight
SCORE BREAKDOWN
5 dimensions, fully transparent
Your ATS score is not a black box. We break it down across 5 critical dimensions so you know exactly where to improve.
- Keyword Coverage: Matches to job requirements
- Skills Alignment: Technical & soft skill mapping
- Experience Relevance: Role-specific experience scoring
- ATS Compatibility: Formatting & parsing readiness
- Impact Quality: Quantified achievements analysis
KEYWORD INTELLIGENCE
Per-keyword tracking, not just a number
Most tools give you a single ATS score. We show you every keyword the ATS is looking for — categorized, tracked, and explained.
- Hard skills vs soft skills categorization
- Per-keyword status: matched, missing, or skipped with reasons
- Keyword frequency matching against job requirements
- Compound phrase detection (e.g., "project management" vs "project" + "management")
Hard Skills
Soft Skills
Skipped: "team player"
Generic soft skill — replaced with specific leadership evidence
WHY IT MATTERS
One ATS test is not enough
A resume that scores 90 on Greenhouse might score 65 on Workday because of a formatting issue. Each system parses differently, weighs criteria differently, and fails resumes for different reasons. Testing against a single system gives you a false sense of security.
Different parsing engines
Workday strips formatting aggressively. Taleo uses legacy technology. What works for one may break on another.
Different scoring weights
Greenhouse prioritizes keywords. iCIMS weighs education and certifications more heavily. Your resume needs to work across all of them.
Universal fixes exist
We identify issues that affect multiple systems and suggest fixes that improve your score everywhere — not just on one platform.
FAQ