Skip to content
Pro Feature

Know your score before the recruiter does

Run five ATS-style simulations. See likely parsing risks by platform pattern — and fix them before you apply.

Basic ATS score included free with every enhancement

5 systems. One dashboard.

See how your resume performs across five common applicant tracking patterns — with per-system scores and issue detection.

swiff.it
Multi-ATS Results5 systems tested
Greenhouse

Keyword matching focus

94Pass
Lever

Experience relevance

91Pass
Workday

Strict formatting requirements

88Pass
Taleo

Legacy parsing technology

72Fix
iCIMS

Education/certification weight

85Pass

6 dimensions, fully transparent

Your ATS score is not a black box. We break it down across 6 critical dimensions so you know exactly where to improve.

  • Skills Coverage: How many of the JD's required skills your resume actually demonstrates (exact + semantic match)
  • Parsing Health: Section completeness, contact info, date hygiene, bullet coverage
  • Recruiter Searchability: The fields recruiters filter on inside ATS dashboards
  • Bullet Impact: Quantification rate, action-verb starts, length distribution
  • Recruiter Readability: Layout signals for the 7.4-second initial scan
  • Experience Relevance: Title alignment, seniority match, domain overlap, tenure fit
swiff.it
ATS Score87
Skills Coverage92
Parsing Health95
Recruiter Searchability88
Bullet Impact84
Recruiter Readability90
Experience Relevance78

Per-keyword tracking, not just a number

Most tools give you a single ATS score. We show you every keyword the ATS is looking for — categorized, tracked, and explained.

  • Hard skills vs soft skills categorization
  • Per-keyword status: matched, missing, or skipped with reasons
  • Keyword frequency matching against job requirements
  • Compound phrase detection (e.g., "project management" vs "project" + "management")
swiff.it
Keyword Analysis12 of 15 matched

Hard Skills

project management agile methodology data analysis SQL

Soft Skills

leadership cross-functional collaboration stakeholder engagement

Skipped: "team player"

Generic soft skill — replaced with specific leadership evidence

One ATS test is not enough

A resume that scores 90 on Greenhouse might score 65 on Workday because of a formatting issue. Each system parses differently, weighs criteria differently, and fails resumes for different reasons. Testing against a single system gives you a false sense of security.

Different parsing engines

Workday strips formatting aggressively. Taleo uses legacy technology. What works for one may break on another.

Different scoring weights

Greenhouse prioritizes keywords. iCIMS weighs education and certifications more heavily. Your resume needs to work across all of them.

Universal fixes exist

We identify issues that affect multiple systems and suggest fixes that improve your score everywhere — not just on one platform.

Common questions about ATS scoring

Stop guessing. Start testing.

See how five ATS-style simulations score your resume. Fix issues before you apply.